We are friends. That is what he calls us. We have sex, so I know we are not just friends. But are we really friends at all?
Even after more than a year and a half, three months of which fell under the guise of dating, pretty much every time we see each other our clothes hit the floor within minutes, whether we were together one week ago or months before. We definitely have chemistry. Whatever else we have, well, that remains elusive.
After three months of dating, I had “the talk.” You know, the one a man typically dreads, particularly the non-committal kind, about what direction a relationship will take.
Having had recently separated from my husband, a “cheater,” exclusivity was (and still is) a high priority for me and not something I had ever imagined compromising. I always valued commitment and security, and since my separation had felt utterly lost without it.
Still single in his mid-forties, the object of my affection was admittedly, and understandably, hesitant to commit to a single mother of three. But I was not asking for much–only the chance to explore any possibility of more blossoming between us.
Instead, he suggested taking a break. And I said goodbye.
A week later I received his text, and a closed door was ambiguously reopened. Innocuously, he referenced an upcoming divorce proceeding of mine, and offered a friendly ear. Looking for prophetic meaning in a fortune cookie, I fantasized he reconsidered his haste in letting me go.
One memorable date later, it was apparent nothing had changed. I was no closer to auditioning for the role of wife and mother than before. From then on he overtly referred to me as a friend. Unspoken, and unwittingly, I was transitioned to a friend with benefits.
We tend to throw around the word friend arbitrarily. Today there are Facebook friends, best friends, and friends with benefits. But what is the distinction?
For years my husband was my best friend, so I know sex and friendship need not be mutually exclusive. True friendship is, or so I thought, based on trust and commitment between two people, and not conditional on any relationship we have with another.
As a friend with benefits, conditions abound. I worry every time I see my “friend” it will be my last. One day he will find someone to marry, and I will be summarily dismissed. After all, his future wife surely will not want him consorting with women he slept with before her. I know I would not.
The friend with benefits label thus becomes merely a misnomer for someone who has repeated casual sex. The ultimate irony is that a casual relationship implies ease and lightheartedness. Attaching the word friend to such an arrangement only misleads its title bearers by imputing depth and intimacy that does not exist. Out of this fallacy a stressful, not casual, situation is potentially born, one laden with jealousy, anxiety, resentment and pain. And so I am left to question, what exactly is so friendly about that?
Pauline Gaines says
Having had an FWB relationship, I am wholeheartedly in support of them. But they only work when both people have the same expectations and needs that are clearly defined from the get-go. The problem arises when one person (usually the man) leads a woman to think he might want more in order to get the benefits — and there’s nothing friendly about being misled.
Stacey Freeman says
Misled or not, the fault is still all mine. The minute I wasn’t getting what I needed or wanted, I should have walked away. Permanently. I have no one to blame for that except myself. But life is about learning and I have no regrets. We are the sum total of our experiences.
Thank you so much for reading.
hurt says
Women please protect yourself from FWB unless you are driven testosterone filled like your male bangers. The end is always a disaster that breaks sprits and bone!
Lizzy says
Here’s the truth: If he’s sleeping with other women, he’s not that into you. If you’re cool with that, and have no unrealistic expectations it will change, proceed! But know that he is out there looking for better. He knows what you offer and it’s not enough– it’s not good enough. I think that’s sad but if he’s not ever going to be “the one” for you either, ok. But if you are looking for a perhaps permanent guy, you are wasting valuable time and energy, and you’re emotionally locking yourself up. Will you bet available for Mr Awesome if you’re in the sack with Mr Buddy who wants nothing else? That’s a pretty big risk, I’ve had these relationships and they SUCK. I haven’t had one that I thought “that was awesome” after it finally ended. I usually just ended up wondering what was wrong with me?